Posts Tagged ‘Film’

Film Festival in a Box – Official Launch Tomorrow Night!

Wednesday, August 11th, 2010

ART IN THE PARK & Film Festival in a Box

Thursday, August 12th, 9PM

Cal Anderson Park

1635 11th Ave

On Thursday, August 12, at 9pm, IndieFlix is launching the new movie game, Film Festival in a Box at Cal Anderson Park! It’s a free and family-friendly event. Bring your cell phone. You’ll need it to vote!

To celebrate the official launch of the game we’re inviting the city of Seattle to come play Film Festival in a Box: Comedies.  After the public, open-air screening of the 4 Short films, everybody will vote by text message to pick the winner.  The event is appropriate for ages 5 and up, and playing time is about 1 hour. The screening will be followed by a wrap party of dessert and discussion across the street at NuBe Green!

Magnolia AV will be sponsoring this event with an incredible 12′ x 16′ screen, supplied by AV Pro, and a crystal clear Epson projector. The sound should be unbelievable as well. (McIntosh XRT1 loudspeakers w/ the MC1.2Kw amps) Hans Brackmann of Magnolia will be on hand to assist anyone with questions related to the equipment.

Film Festival in a Box (FFB) is a social gaming platform that connects people through movies.  Players will watch four short independent films and then act as a jury to determine which film will win “best of the fest in a box.”  The winners will be announced online, and winning filmmakers will be awarded a cash prize, making it a great way to support independent film.

Comedies is one of four versions of the Film Festival in a Box Game. Currently other boxes include: Powered by Girls, Pottymouth Comedies, and 4 Fantastical Short Films.

COME PLAY!

ABOUT INDIEFLIX

IndieFlix is a multi-platform film distribution company founded in 2004 to help independent filmmakers take advantage of new media and connect with their audience.  In 2010, IndieFlix presents Film Festival in a Box to remind the world that independent film is more than just unique, visionary, and honest:  it’s also a lot of fun.  Film Festival in a Box is made to spark conversations that will last for years to come, while awakening a new generation of audiences to the joy of independent film.

“Movies are THE MOST powerful medium, they can change the world!”
- Whoopi Goldberg, IndieFlix advisory board

“Indie filmmakers need what IndieFlix delivers.”
- Lance Weiler, Filmmaker and Founder of The Workbook Project

Contact Info:

Will Kelly, Film Acquisitions Manager

T 206.829.9112 | C 206.618.4147 | E will@indieflix.com | www.indieflix.com

SNEAK PEEK: FILM FESTIVAL IN A BOX

Thursday, July 29th, 2010

Wednesday, August 4th, 7PM

Roy Street Coffee & Tea

700 Broadway Ave E

If you love movies, you’ll love this game!

On Wednesday, August 4, at 7pm, Roy Street Coffee & Tea is featuring a sneak peek of the new movie game, Film Festival in a Box: 4 Fantastical Short Films! It’s a free and family-friendly event. Bring your cell phone. You’ll need it!

Film Festival in a Box (FFB) is a social gaming platform that connects people through movies.  Players will watch four short independent films and then get to act as a jury to determine which film will win “best of the fest in a box.”  The winners will be announced online, making it a great way to support independent film.

At Roy Street, players will deliberate and vote by cell phone to pick the winner.  The event is appropriate for ages 5 and up, and playing time is about 1 hour.

4 Fantastical Short Films is one of four versions of the Film Festival in a Box Game. Currently other boxes include: Comedies, Pottymouth Comedies, and Powered by Girls.

The August 4 preview of Film Festival in a Box is part of the “IndieFlix Rogue Screenings,” a monthly screening series at Roy Street Coffee and Tea at 7pm on the first Wednesday of every month.  Screenings are free and open to the public.

COME PLAY!

ABOUT INDIEFLIX

IndieFlix is a multi-platform film distribution company founded in 2004 to help independent filmmakers take advantage of new media and connect with their audience.  In 2010, IndieFlix presents Film Festival in a Box to remind the world that independent film is more than just unique, visionary, and honest:  it’s also a lot of fun.  Film Festival in a Box is made to spark conversations that will last for years to come, while awakening a new generation of audiences to the joy of independent film.

“Movies are THE MOST powerful medium, they can change the world!”
- Whoopi Goldberg, IndieFlix advisory board

“Indie filmmakers need what IndieFlix delivers.”
- Lance Weiler, Filmmaker and Founder of The Workbook Project

Contact Info:

Will Kelly, Film Acquisitions Manager

T 206.829.9112 | C 206.618.4147 | E will@indieflix.com | www.indieflix.com

We have a winner! IndieFlix sponsors WorkBook Project and Discovery Distribution Award.

Thursday, July 29th, 2010

One Hundred Mornings

Conor Horgan’s ‘One Hundred Mornings’ has won the inaugural WorkBook Project Discovery and Distribution Award which seeks to highlight an outstanding film that they feel has been overlooked in terms of US distribution.

The winning film will now receive a theatrical release at the Downtown Independent Theater in Los Angeles, CA complete with full social media, street team and PR support.

Set up by Lance Weiler the Workbook Project is an open creative network that provides insight into the process of funding, creating, distributing and sustaining creative projects. Judges for the prize included producers Ted Hope (The Ice Storm, Lovely & Amazing, The Savages) and Scott Macaulay (Gummo, Julien Donkey Boy, Raising Victor Vargas, also editor of Filmmaker magazine).

‘One Hundred Mornings’ was chosen from submissions from all over the world to rece

ive the award. Produced by Katie Holly for Bl!nder Films and written and directed by Conor Horgan, One Hundred Mornings is set in a world upended by a complete breakdown of society, two couples hide out in a lakeside cabin hoping to survive the crisis. The film stars Ciaran McMenamin (The Last Confession of Alexander Pearce, Outcast), Alex Reid (The Descent), Rory Keenan (Zonad, The Guard) and Kelly Campbell (Bachelors Walk, Sensation).

‘One Hundred Mornings’ has previously picked up honors at Galway, Slamdance and the Irish Film & Television Awards (2010). The film continues its festival run next month with appearances at the Rhode Island International Film Festival in August and the San Francisco Irish Film Festival in September, among others.

‘One Hundred Mornings’ will begin its theatrical run in Los Angeles on September 16th 2010.

6 Ways to Make People Watch Your Movie – Part 2: Make Them Laugh

Friday, January 29th, 2010

6WaysPart2

[Note: In part one of this series I talked about the six basic motivators that filmmakers can uses to get people excited about their films.  The next few parts will look at each motivator in depth.]

Part 2: Make Them Laugh

We filmmakers need to get people excited about our films.  Rather than hoping to stumble across a successful marketing approach for a film, it’s better to plan one from the very start–ideally before you commit to making the film–and tweak it based on what really gets people to pay to watch movies.  “6 Ways” is about those things that motivate someone to say, “I’ve got to see that!”

So how do movies like Napoleon Dynamite or The Hangover rocket from obscurity to national reknown in the blink of an eye.  Is it the big stars?  The special effects?  The action scenes?   Actually, it turns out these movies are really, really funny.

People like funny. (more…)

6 Ways to Make People Watch Your Movie

Wednesday, December 2nd, 2009
6 Ways to Sell Tickets

6 Ways to Sell Tickets

Independent filmmakers operating on the “Fade in to cash out” philosophy have to face a very simple truth:  A film can only be financially sustainable if people watch it.  Of course, getting people to watch your film doesn’t guarantee fiscal success, but not doing so guarantees failure.

So from the very start, we need to think about why people would watch our movies.  Well, why do people watch any movies?  If you look at films that have found audiences, it looks like there are about six basic motivators that are effective to get people to watch your film.  Studio films are well aware of them and use them constantly and usually in combination.  Indie filmmakers need to think about them just as much—maybe more, since we don’t have huge advertising budgets to cram our movies down people’s throats.  And indies should be aware that while the basic motivators for generating audience interest are the same whatever the movie, how we take advantage of these methods could be very different.

Six Motivators

The six ways to make people watch your movie:

1.  Promise to make them laugh.

This is pretty simple but amazingly powerful.  People love to laugh.  If people think they’ll laugh their asses off at a movie, they’ll watch it.  This helps explain why so many movies that are actually downers get a trailer cut to make them look like sublime comedies.  I’m not a fan of lying to the audience—I think breaking this promise comes back to get you.  But I can see where the lure of this powerful tool often results in misleading trailers.  I’ll talk more about this and all the motivators later, but the simple takeaway is, if your film is legitimately funny—a comedy or dramedy—make those funny moments shine.

2.  Promise to make them scared.

This one isn’t complicated either.  Fear and laughter are two primal emotions.  Tapping into either can be a great way to get people to go see a movie.  Paranormal Activity is currently enjoying a huge run of success based on about three scary moments.  Is that misleading the audience or just brilliant marketing?  Decide for yourself, but the lesson is pretty clear: screams = money.

3.  Promise great special effects and action sequences.

Why is the acting often terrible in action films?  Because nobody’s watching for the acting.  Action and effects films tap into another primal emotion—the adrenaline rush.  There’s always an audience for big explosions, stunts, or special effects.  Half of it is just the thrill of the ride and the other half is the experience of seeing something on screen that’s never been shown before.  A bigger stunt, a cooler fight.  And these films are highly re-watchable.  People got right back in line to buy another ticket to see the bullet-time effects in The Matrix or the hammer fight in Old Boy.

4.   Sell the film on people the audience already likes.

The first three methods all build audiences by tapping into primal emotions.  In my mind they’re the most powerful since they don’t rely on anything outside themselves.  That may seem odd to say because none of them involve the #1 trick from the studio playbook:  Casting big names.

Casting name actors falls under selling the film on people the audience already likes.  It’s tapping into the known brand.  Personally, I’d argue that it’s a less powerful motivator than the methods above (maybe even the least powerful of the methods) on it’s own.  It has the benefit of allowing a lot of publicity about the film based on the star, but publicity on its own doesn’t make people want to go to a film.  There are tons of films out there that I keep hearing about and the more I hear, the less I want to see them.  No, publicity just creates the opportunity to show the audience motivators a film does have (laughs, screams, thrill-rides, etc.)

Selling a film on the people the audience already likes can be for more than just big stars.  Often an indie film can make a great casting choice with actors audiences like yet don’t rise to the ‘star’ level.  Other films may have no stars or even known actors but still succeed on the name of the director.  People who go to a David Gordon Green film are going for the auteur.  Gus Van Sant’s Elephant was cast with non-actors and sold on his name.  This motivator often seems (or is) out of reach for independents making their first films, but as you build an audience of people who follow your work, you can become your own brand.

5.  Have seven people tell them the film is great.

This is where quality comes in.  Make a great film and eventually the word of mouth gets around.  Unfortunately, it takes a long time for that to happen.  I heard of one study that found people had to be told a product was good by an average of seven different sources before they chose to buy it.  (No I don’t recall the study and I’m not looking it up.  Statistics are all worse than damn lies anyway!  It’s got to be some number and seven feels right to me.)

When audiences see films based on quality, it’s really based on people telling them it’s good.  These can be trusted reviewers or friends who’ve seen the film.  Two problems with this are the time it takes to build real grassroots word-of-mouth, and being at the mercy of reviewers to mention the film, let alone like it!

Word-of-mouth is possibly the most powerful of all the motivators.  If all your friends tell you a movie is great, don’t you want to see it?  Word-of-mouth also has the tremendous advantage of being very inexpensive to promote.  It even taps into all the things we independent filmmakers hope for when we make our films—a film so good that everyone tells their friends and it sells itself.  Unfortunately, relying on word-of-mouth alone is a tough way to sell a movie.  Sadly I think the majority of independent filmmakers expect to sell their films on this basis and have little else to turn to if it doesn’t work immediately.  Everyone hopes for good reviews and word-of-mouth.  But when people say a film is “review dependent” it often means that the filmmakers didn’t build in any other motivators to get the audiences to the show.

6.  Make them feel involved.

Ever go to a screening of a film you or a friend worked on?  Maybe even if you don’t think it was going to be a great film?  I’ve watched a bunch of films for that reason.  And not just for the networking opportunities, or the after-party, or the morbid curiosity.  I went because I felt involved.  I’d been a part of that movie’s genesis somehow and I wanted to see how it turned out and support it however I could.

That’s the power of involvement.  If people feel involved in the creation of a film it’s hard to keep them away from the theater.  You can count on them seeing the film and telling their friends.

Involvement doesn’t have to mean being part of the cast or crew.  Many shrewd film marketers have found ways to make an ethnic group or subculture feel involved in a film and therefore become its initial core market.  The social networking that many independent filmmakers are currently using is all about making people feel involved.  To go back to the recent phenom, Paranormal Activity, the marketers used the “Demand it” campaign to get people to request the film be released and brought to their town.  All these people (supposedly a million…which is probably about as accurate as the statistic I mentioned above) felt involved in the film—a sense of ownership for their role in bringing it to their theater.  Make the audience feel involved, and there’s a good chance they’ll come to your movie with a carload of friends.

Making Promises

You’ll notice that most of these are promises.  You promise the audience that they’ll laugh, be scared, dig the big explosions.  The marketing campaign for a film is usually about making these “promises” in the form of trailer moments, poster design, and the like.

Let me be clear, these motivators are the ways to get people interested in going to a film.  They are the psychological locks that you have to fit your key into.  Trailers, commercials, merchandising tie-ins—all those things are ways of promoting a film, getting the word out, creating awareness.  But they don’t make anyone actually want to go to the movie unless they exploit one or more of these methods.

These motivators rarely work alone.  Studios like to cram as many motivators as possible into one film.  What’s a Die Hard movie marketing campaign but the promise of a film with lots of action and explosions, funny moments, a few good scares, and Bruce Willis in the lead?

Independents can also get in on this act but combining their motivators.  The marketing team from My Big Fat Greek Wedding had little in the way of big cast, scares, or explosions to sell on, but masterfully combined the promise of a funny movie with an involved audience (it initially opened in Greek ethnic communities, playing to the Greek family elements of the film) and then opened up when word-of-mouth to become the most successful independent release of its time.

Studio films have a lot of resources that indies don’t have, but whatever their budgets, they’re still trying to fit keys into people’s psychological keyholes.  Indies can do this just as well—usually with less expensive methods.  But one of the tricks is to think about it from the very beginning.

In the coming weeks I plan to write more about this and how independents can use these motivators (and are using them) to get people to watch their films.  For now, though, think about the film or script you’re trying to sell.  Which of these effective motivators do you have or could you add to make people want to watch your film?  Because getting people to watch is one key to getting to make films and keep making them.


Douglas Horn is a writer, director, and producer of independent films. His films include Entry Level, The No-Sit List, and Full Disclosure. http://www.douglashorn.com/wordpress/

NewFlix Tuesday April 28th, 2009

Tuesday, April 28th, 2009

This Week’s New Releases:

Thriller

22456 Caramel
SYNOPSIS: (Short Film)
A young woman breaks down when her male lover pushes her to the edge in this psychological thriller.

Film Festival Screenings:
Winnipeg International Film Festival

Watch STREAMING $1.95 Purchase the DVD $5.95
22319 Rendezvous
SYNOPSIS: (Short Film)
While en route to an unknown location, female assassin Chapman receives a phone call from fellow assassin Booth, with whom it is clear she has a close relationship. Booth tells her that he has just “missed his target”, spawning a conversation between the two of them on their current career choices.

Film Festival Screenings:
Atlanta Film Festival
Beverly Hills HD Film Festival
Rockport Film Festival
Traildance Film Festival
Lake County Film Festival

Watch STREAMING $1.95 Purchase the DVD $5.95

Drama

22933 Lost in New Mexico: The Strange Tale of Susan Hero
SYNOPSIS: (Short Film)
In a desert town somewhere in the Southwestern USA, a young woman seeks to bring her recently deceased daughter back to life, through the services of maverick animal cloning expert, Dr. Kurt Morell. Accompanied by her illegal immigrant companion, Javier Appollinaire, Susan begins a secret journey to rendezvous with the Doctor in order to begin the procedure…

Film Festival Screenings:
Route 66 Film Festival
Riverside Film Festival
International Panorama of Independent Filmmakers (Greece)

Watch STREAMING $4.95 Purchase the DVD $9.95

Documentary

22725 Blondes Are Latin Too
SYNOPSIS: (Short Film)
Jezabel Montero takes you on a tongue in cheek journey, through the streets and offices of New York city, to ask the public and industry professionals, ‘why don’t we ever see a blonde, blue eyed, light Latino, playing Latino roles in mainstream film and tv? Why the cookie cutter Latino? What does the word Latino even mean, in Hollywood?” Ms. Montero gives some insight and humor to this secretly acceptable form of discrimination.

Film Festival Screenings:
Womens International Film Festival
Orlando Hispanic Film Festival

Watch STREAMING $4.95 Purchase the DVD $14.95
22913 Terry Shimazu – Blind Musician
SYNOPSIS: (Short Film)
Terry Shimazu is a talented Japanese jazz pianist who lives and works in Austin, Texas.

Watch STREAMING $1.95 Purchase the DVD $5.95

What’s in a rating? A letter to parents on the MPAA.

Monday, April 6th, 2009

750px-mpaa_logosvg

To share or not to share on the rating we received from the MPAA on the film April Showers?  Andrew Robinson, director of the soon to be released April Showers and I were discussing whether we should share our frustration on what seems to be an unfair and inappropriate rating from the MPAA.  We feel strongly that next weeks appeal process will render a PG13 rating but we did not want to scare off a portion of our audience in sharing this stage of the process.

What we realized is that there clearly needs to be more knowledge in general on what the MPAA ratings really mean and how they are assigned.  We decided to share…

Scilla Andreen

CEO IndieFlix

What’s in a rating? A letter to parents

What’s in a rating? A letter to parents

Last week the MPAA saw it fit to give April Showers an R-rating for it’s intense subject matter and realistic depiction of violence, however they did concede that the violence in April Showers was not gratuitous nor excessive. They felt that the violence, knowing that April Showers is based on actual events, makes it more real than other types or forms of violence normally depicted in motion pictures. Furthermore they concluded that it would be best for parents to see April Showers with their teenage children to be able to explain and/or discuss the violence they saw either during or following the film. By giving April Showers an R-rating the MPAA saw an opportunity to effectively “force” parents to get involved in the viewing habits of their children. Seeing as how the target audience for this film is teens, most of which are under the age of 17, it would seem that they’ve put the breaks on our ability to reach out to the younger audience.

Nope.
While I disagree with the MPAA’s ruling, and will be appealing it next week, April Showers must move forward with the knowledge that the final verdict may still result in an R-rating. In many ways I see this as hugely unfair, but at the same time, am done fretting over it. So the film may get an R-rating, okay, where do we go from here?
We go to theaters. We go to where the audiences still want to see this film, which despite the news of the MPAA’s rating still includes many younger teens (14+) who are willing to see it with their parents or guardian. The truth of the matter is, this film has never been about a rating. We need a rating in order to play in theaters across this country and we have one. It may not be the one we want, nor the one we ultimately end up with, but we have it and can move on.
So parents, this letter is directed at you. If you’ve been following us these past few months and have taken no issue with anything you’ve seen, read or listened to myself or others talk about and deemed it appropriate for your son or daughter then I assure you viewing the film, while difficult at times perhaps, will be no different. I hope throughout this whole process I’ve been open and honest with you all and that regardless of what label the MPAA decides to slap us with you’ll know what to expect when viewing April Showers in theaters. However, if you have not been following us, or are relatively new to the April Showers family, then first let me say welcome and second fill you in a bit on what to expect when viewing April Showers either for yourself or with your children.
April Showers is not a violent film in the way you may expect an R-rated film to be. If the R-rating is an attractor for you because you like to view violent or subversive content then I fear the film may be a let down for you for the film is no more violent than watching the news or viewing an episode of Law & Order. While the overall driving topic behind April Showers may be of a violent circumstance the way that it is handled on screen is anything but. It is my personal belief as a storyteller and director that the world doesn’t need to see more graphic images in order for their to be impact, again this is my personal belief and one that I do not force upon others nor do I slight other, more violent films, because of it. Instead of showing the outright violence of a school shooting, like Columbine, myself, along with my cast and crew, chose to imply the violence and chaos in many other ways.
Much of the highly traumatic moments are handled through editing, sound, sound editing, lighting and the actors themselves and not in the outright bloodshed or wonton graphic violence. That being said, there are characters, both large and small, that do perish in the film, however none meet their end in a vulgar or graphic way. When you do see a victim or body it is usually during a rapid camera movement or in shadow. If the victim is in frame for any meaningful amount of time with which to register or elicit an knee jerk reaction it is not accompanied by blood or gore. However, while we may not out right “show” violence because of the situation and realistic reactions given by the actors the audiences have and do believe the peril thus making the inferred violence feel more real. Truthfully, this approach is largely the reason behind the MPAA giving us an R-rating for it seems audiences are more comfortable with seeing excessive violence and bloodshed versus not seeing it and being put in an uncomfortable situation that forces them to contemplate and think about the outcome of said violence. If that mind set is what has truly earned me and this film an R-rating then I take it as a compliment for I think audience shouldn’t view violence of any kind blindly and devoid of any emotion regardless of the overall topic, theme or tone of a film. Violence is violence and while it may be accompanied with a snappy punch line or driving rock soundtrack someone or something is doing harm to another and we must be aware of that versus numb to it.
Beyond the violence there is no vulgar language, drug use, nudity or sexual content of any kind in April Showers. The reason for this is not because I am a prude or because I am trying to be holier-than-thou, it is because in order to film the movie in an active school using a majority of an active student body we had to tailor the script to fit within the parameters of what the school board and parents felt was a PG-13 rated film. We did this willingly and I believe the film is better for it. Now if you view the word(s) “hell” and “shit” as excessively vulgar then I do apologize but want you to know that both words are in the film a total of two times or one time per offense. However, both words fall within the realm of a PG-13 film thus were not cut from the film and not the reason for the R-rating.
The film deals largely with issues pertaining to the direct aftermath of school violence and the struggles students, teachers, parents and communities go through as the result. The film touches upon issues pertaining to friendship, love, loss, religion, faith and accountability to name a few. Honestly, the issues I’ve just mentioned are what most viewers come away from the film talking about more than what they physically saw on screen. This simple fact, the conversation(s) the film starts is one of the biggest reasons behind my wanting to make April Showers for everyone to see.
So, with that said I now ask something of you. If you are a parent and your teenage son or daughter is not of the legal age to view an R-rated film but they wish to see April Showers I urge you to make a date with your child and see the film. I truly believe, and the MPAA agrees oddly enough, that this is a film that should be seen by as wide an audience as possible for it has the ability to effect and promote positive change. I recently received word from a principal of a high school, who showed the film to his students and their parents, informing me that he has witnessed a dramatic change in the attitude, mindset and general well being the kids are expressing and showing towards one another. While this is the most recent correspondence of this nature it is not the sole one nor will it be the last.
April Showers is here to show a side of tragedy many people, thankfully, don’t ever have to experience. That being said, it’s a side of the coin that when even viewed in a cinematic form can have a profound positive effect on those who may not of otherwise understood it or known of its existence. This effect is what people are taking away from the film and in subtle and not so subtle ways applying it to their everyday lives.
Lastly, I’d would like to say please don’t think that if we get our R-rating overturned and lessened to a PG-13 that it is still an R-rated film in sheeps clothing. If I truly believed April Showers deserved an R-rating then I would accept it wholeheartedly and without protest, it’s just that I don’t feel it’s an R-rated film. PG-13? Absolutely. But I also want to point out that while the MPAA doesn’t feel that all audiences can handle the “real subject matter” contained within the film, they don’t seem to concerned with trying to censor or protect underage eyes from the news coverage of Columbine like shootings all over the world. On the ten-year anniversary of the Columbine tragedy, which is coming up in a few weeks, we will, once again, be inundated with images from that day. Images that will depict acts of violence not only in blood shed, but in the overall handling and coverage of the event that the victims and victims families were forced to relive day in and day out. If your son or daughter has viewed any footage that was captured the day of Columbine (or any other school shooting) then they’ve already seen far worse than anything I could possibly show in the film April Showers. All I hope for, is that by viewing April Showers those real images now have real meaning and can be accompanied by discourse and understanding that promotes growth and emotional understanding of our fellow men and women that can curb these acts of violence from happening again.
I thank you all so very much for your time, consideration and support. I will keep you posted as to the results of our ratings appeal. Until next time, I wish you all the very best, take care and stay tuned…
Sincerely,
Andrew Robinson
Writer/Director
April Showers

Heading to The Conversation, an industry think tank in my opinion…

Thursday, October 16th, 2008

The Conversation -This will be an amazing event!

To All IndieFlix Filmmakers & Subscribers,

This is already an amazing event.  Here are the reasons why:

1. Leading innovators and newsmakers all in one room for 2 days sharing openly and listening.
2. There is no product, festival or company agenda at play.
3. The price is less than 1/5 of what a conference would cost.
4. Up close and personal access for both speakers and guests to share ideas.

to register: http://www.theconversationspot.com/registration.html

"We only endorse people and gatherings we truly believe in…
The Conversation is just such an event!  I hope you will attend. We all
look forward to
meeting you.

Scilla Andreen, filmmaker, ceo & co-founder IndieFlix

The Future of Cinema, Games & Online Video: New Tools/ New Distribution / New Rules

This October, pioneers at the forefront of change in cinema, video,
games, media and technology are coming together to share ideas,
insights, and innovations. Our focus is on new tools, new distribution
channels, and new rules.

The
format of the gathering will be experimental: rather than a traditional
conference, short talks and demos, "fireside chats," and roundtables
will spark a dynamic series of overlapping conversations.

 

All this will happen at UC Berkeley’s renowned Pacific Film Archive theater
over two days this October. It’s a conversation that will bring
together media-makers and technologists to share experiences, discuss,
debate, and map out the future together.

Some of the topics we’ll touch on, and the people who’ll lead the conversation, are listed here. But we also want to invite you to suggest other topics … ones that you want to see added or address yourself.

Just added to the site: A list of some of the people who’ll be part of The Conversation.

We hope you’ll join us this fall …

The Goal
Our hunch is that we’re at an important moment in the history of
technology and visual storytelling — a broad term that encompasses
filmmaking, TV, online video, and narrative-driven games.

New
software is making incredible things possible in visual effects and
animation, and also democratizing those fields. Web sites offer to help
finance film projects, or share ad revenue with video-makers. Marketing
and release strategies are shifting by the minute. High-end high-def
cameras are plummeting in price. The connection with the audience is
changing. Established ways of doing things just don’t seem to be
working anymore, while new opportunities are emerging.

Our goal is for The Conversation to delve into all those issues — and
more, with your ideas, help, and participation. The Conversation will
focus exclusively on the new business and creative opportunities that
are arising in 2008.

We expect every participant to bring his or her concerns, questions, or
examples of what they’ve been doing and how well it’s working, to share
during the sessions or during the designated schmooze-time. (There will
also be an opportunity to present during a Saturday workshop session.)

The overall goal is for The Conversation to be a real exchange of ideas
— a gathering of people working on the edge and thinking about the
future.

Continue reading "The Conversation -This will be an amazing event!" »

| Comments (0)

| TrackBack (0)